Revolutionary Misfit

Dare to be Inspirational

COVID-19 is Accelerating the Descent into Madness

by Leave a Comment

COVID-19 is Accelerating the Descent into Madness

A recent interaction on my FaceBook profile page leads me to believe that COVID-19 is accelerating the descent into madness among my fellow Americans…

I post a lot of stuff that interests me on my page. I post music that I like and find provocative, especially by the Grateful Dead (surely to the annoyance of many of my unenlightened friends). I post pictures of family and the beauty of my adopted country, Costa Rica. Occasionally, I will post a political meme, but I really don’t like those, as I find them lacking in nuance and usually intellectually insulting. I post books that I’ve recently read. I do that because I’m always on the lookout for good reading suggestions, so I like to offer a few myself for my friends to consider. And I post articles, some of them political, but only after carefully reading and vetting each. I try not to post anything that I find to be conspiratorial, or factually inaccurate.

I have FaceBook friends (some real and some virtual) with varying and often contrasting political ideals. I have quite a few friends who are conservative Trump supporters. After all, I hail from the Carolinas, which by and large is an area supportive of Donald Trump. So, a lot of my old friends from back home disagree with much of what I post. And I’m perfectly OK with that. In fact, I welcome the engagement of healthy and heated debate, as long as it remains respectful.

However, what happened recently on my page was definitely heated, but neither healthy, nor respectful, …

I posted a thoughtful article by Ezra Klein on the abject failure of the Trump administration in responding to the pandemic. I read a lot of Ezra’s stuff, books and articles, and I frequently listen to his podcast. I find him to be an intellectual worth listening to. However, he is predominantly of a liberal leaning mindset. And I don’t always agree with him. I would say that I’m decidedly more on the progressive side compared to Ezra.

Almost immediately upon posting this article I had a Trump supporter offer a comment on my post (I am quite sure without ever having taking the time to actually read the article). The comment basically said that by posting this article I would surely lose 50% of my real estate client base…I guess assuming that 50% of said base would take issue with the article to such a degree as to “fire” me over it…

If this “friend” was actually trying to “help” me by offering business advice…that ain’t the way to do it. And furthermore, if making money means that I can’t express my political views, peacefully and respectfully, on my own FaceBook page, well then I guess he’s right…I’m headed straight for the poor-house!

Suffice it to say that I responded to his comment in a way that I don’t respond very often. To paraphrase, I invited him to quickly exit my FaceBook page and go straight to hell!

I take political positions on my page. It’s my personal page. I think I’m allowed to do that. In fact, a quick perusal of my former friend’s (he unfriended me after this encounter) page confirmed that about 90% of the content is overtly political and usually insulting to anyone of a contrary viewpoint. Nevertheless, I refrained from any reciprocal trolling.

I have another page dedicated to my real estate business and I do not post anything remotely political over there. I don’t think it’s the place to do so and fans of that page do not want to see political crap, but rather content related to Costa Rica real estate and expat living.

So, what gives a Trump supporter the audacious idea that he can attack a person in this manner just because he disagrees with a political post?

Isn’t the whole concept of democracy predicated upon peaceful political debate?

If you want to eradicate all political debate and do so by threatening opposing views with financial (or, worse, physical) repercussion, then aren’t we converting our system to something far less than democratic? Doesn’t that sound a lot like what takes place in, say, Russia, China, or North Korea? I thought conservative Trump supporters were staunchly against totalitarianism of that nature?

You see, you can’t have it both ways. You can’t make America great again and at the same time try to make it a place where everyone marches in lockstep (or “goose-step”) politically.

Is that really the world you want to live in, or want your grandchildren to be borne into?

And what does a virus have to do with all this? Why is it that COVID-19 is accelerating the descent into madness, as opposed to everything else that’s happened over the last three years?

COVID-19 is exposing some dark truths about American society. As we are standing out as the most exceptional nation on the planet, in terms of COVID-19 cases and deaths, the gross excesses of our overly materialistic society are rising to the surface like a plucked Phoenix from the ashes. This unseen enemy (as Trump likes to call it) has rendered our mighty and invincible economy incapable of even providing adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) for the essential workers on the front-lines, exposing themselves while fighting to keep the rest of us safe. Can you imagine a response like this in the aftermath of Pearl Harbor, or 9-11?

When it comes to blowing up other people in far away lands, we always seem to find the means to do so. But we can’t seem to find those same means to provide adequate testing and tracing to try to contain this “Chinese” pathogen, or at least not for the most vulnerable among us.

And as the economy shrinks under shelter in place orders, the gloves come off and the AR-15’s are taken down from the truck racks. People are fighting mad and someone has to be blamed for this mess…

And while we are blaming and threatening each other, spitting mad, the virus spreads, people die, and the great American economy further collapses…

And the COVID-19 descent into madness accelerates.

Agenda-based Science in the Age of COVID-19

by Leave a Comment

Agenda-based Science in the Age of COVID-19

When did we stop trusting in science?

Those of the fundamentalist religious persuasion stopped trusting around the time of the Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925. And as far as that crowd goes, things haven’t changed a whole lot since then…

But how about the rest of us, who consider ourselves a bit more even-keeled?

It seems these days a healthy trust in, versus skepticism of, science always breaks down along political lines. The democrats seem to be much more accepting of the prognostications of science than are the republicans.

Why is that?

It seems to have something to do with the now decades long “controversy” surrounding climate change. Although, I believe the real reason goes a bit deeper than just that.

Climate change is accepted science…period. I’m not going to waste any effort here trying to argue that point. You can do your own research…just do it in the right places and avoid the crackpots. And these days there’s no shortage of those!

Acceptance of climate change breaks down along political lines, more-so than perhaps any scientific topic in modern history. You might have to go back to the Copernican revolution to find a more hotly debated topic surrounding settled science.

According to Pew Research, 90% of democrats believe the government is doing too little to combat climate change, versus 39% of republicans.

Why is climate change so hard for republicans to accept?

Well, one could point to the leadership, or lack thereof, by our current president. He is a staunch climate change denier (or, at best, skeptic) and he influences millions of his die-hard supporters to believe likewise…

And he has Fox News constantly backing him up!

Republicans tend to believe that the whole climate change issue is wrapped up in agenda-based science, or science in pursuit of a political agenda…

And what is that agenda, exactly?

According to republicans, it is to turn the U.S.A. into a socialist, or even communist, state. Republicans distrust big government…such distrust is the very sine quo non of conservatism…

Never-mind that in many ways Donald Trump has expanded government far beyond his predecessor(s). One need only look at the current federal deficit for proof of that.

When civilization is faced with big non-economic problems, like an alien invasion (of the “outer-space” variety), meteor strike, an out of control climate, or a world-wide pandemic, it’s usually science that comes to the rescue.

Science supplies us with the facts and the actions we need to take based on those facts. Then it takes collective action, i.e. government action, to execute those scientific-based solutions…

COVID-19 presents one of these instances where humanity must turn to science for answers, perhaps like none other in recent generations. That’s not to downplay the effect of climate change, but climate change is a creeping problem, whereas COVID-19 has jumped up and bit us in the ass overnight…to the tune of over 50,000 deaths in the U.S. alone, and counting.

Nevertheless, we have some out there, mostly on the right, who’re playing politics with a freaking virus, as if it could possibly be cognizant of political affiliation.

The truth is that science and politics, like religion and politics, make for strange bedfellows. In fact, there should be a wall of separation between them…

Oh wait, there is a wall between church and state…

How about between science and state?

It should not be up to republicans, or the republican president, to decide which science they (or he) will support. And the same, of course, goes with democrats. If science tells us that the only way to defeat COVID-19 is by collective action that will have economic repercussions, then that’s the solution we’re all faced with accepting, period.

Our capitalistic economic system is not science and neither is it decreed by the almighty. It’s just an economic theory that proposes a market solution to pretty much everything. But there’s not a market solution to COVID-19. Capitalism won’t save us here. Conservatism, with its belief in limited (or no) government, won’t save us here.

In fact, this crisis is dramatically exposing how capitalism, at least the kind that has run amok in the last few decades, is failing society.

The U.S.A. has surpassed all other countries in the world in virtually all statistics (i.e., the negative ones) related to COVID-19. The U.S.A. has the most cases, the most deaths, and one of the highest fatality rates.

This little bug has made a shambles of the mighty American market and of so-called American exceptionalism.

We must all immediately stop the madness of allowing political division to get in the way of doing the right thing. And that means doing the thing(s) science tells us to do, no matter how painful, or inconsistent with your political beliefs, it might be.

I’m afraid COVID-19 presents us with this stark choice between science and politics like nothing ever has, at least in my lifetime. This crisis is presenting us with hard choices. I can understand the tendency towards skepticism. But skepticism won’t serve us here. Playing politics with a pathogen won’t serve us here.

This tendency towards agenda-based science in the age of COVID-19 is going to show us how destructive the political division really can be…

Perhaps that’s the “agenda” of this virus?

The Cruelty of COVID-19

by Leave a Comment

The Cruelty of COVID-19

Something that has dawned upon me as of late is the cruelty of COVID-19. I’m not talking about the fact that it’s a virus that makes us sick, as all those suckers do. I’m talking about this cynical and downright insidious cruelty that’s putting the human race squarely upon the horns of a moral dilemma.

Let’s put this disease in perspective. If you’ll remember, when the news of COVID-19 first broke out, many were comparing it to the common flu. In a previous post I introduced a statistic called the reproduction number (or R0). The R0 of the coronavirus that causes COVID-19 (the disease that results from infection) is estimated at around 2.2, versus 1.3 for the flu. If you read my post, you’d know that R0 is the average number of people a given person with the virus will infect. So, it appears that COVID-19 is significantly more contagious than the flu.

It’s also far more deadly. It’s still uncertain, but most experts put the COVID-19 fatality rate at between 1 and 2%. The fatality rate for the flu is well-known to be .1%, so COVID-19 is anywhere from 10 to 20 times more deadly.

Now, we don’t put the brakes on the entire economy due to the flu. And granted there are virus-borne diseases out there, like Ebola, that are far more deadly than COVID-19. So, why are we eager to inflict so much damage to ourselves over COVID-19?

Consider what the results would be if we just let COVID-19 run its course. How many people would be infected? Well, the flu infects around 9% of the world population annually. We already established that COVID-19 is more contagious, so let’s say that if we just stepped aside and did nothing, 10% of the world would get infected and 1.5% of those infected would die. There are approximately 7.8 billion people on our planet, so if COVID-19 infected 10% of them, that would mean 780,000,000 infected and at a fatality rate of 1.5%, about 117 million people dead!

If what I just wrote seems outlandish to you, consider that the Spanish Flu of 1918 killed between 17 and 50 million (with some estimates as high as 100 million).

As alarming as the numbers I just presented are, the dilemma posed by the cruelty of COVID-19 nevertheless remains…

Why do we need to destroy the economy and do so much damage to practically everyone, when only a small minority actually get infected by COVID-19 and an even smaller percentage dies?

It’s the age-old utilitarian argument of John Stuart Mill versus the moral imperative of Immanuel Kant.

If you think about it, capitalism is largely justified by the utilitarian argument. That is, at least in the U.S. and other democratic regimes, we choose the utilitarian benefits of a capitalistic economy that flow to society at large, even though a smaller portion of the populace is damaged by it. And now you have Trump, a staunch capitalist, trying to make that same argument when it comes to COVID-19. He does this by arguing that we should open the economy back up even when doing so probably means a much larger percentage of the population will become infected and many more deaths will occur as a result.

Now, I’m no hard-core capitalist and certainly no fan of Donald Trump. But even for me this is a hard one. I’ve already been affected by this thing economically and I’m afraid more damage is yet to be personally experienced.

In Costa Rica 90% of the infections have occurred in the metropolitan area around the capital city of San Jose. In Perez Zeledon where I live, there have only been 3 confirmed cases and it’s been that way for going on 3 weeks now. So, why does the economy of the entire country have to be shut down? Why can’t I go to my favorite watering hole for a beer? Why can’t I drive my car on the highway today? Why are my real estate customers being denied entry into the country?

Why? Why? Why?

It just doesn’t seem fair!

The moral argument of Kant, his “categorical imperative”, tells me that I should judge a certain personal behavior as moral only if its universal application (that is, by everyone) would render an acceptable result. In other words, whether or not I should just go about my daily living as if this COVID-19 thing never happened, depends on the result that could occur if everyone did the same thing. And I believe we know the answer to that question…

The whole concept of social-distancing falls in line with Kant’s categorical imperative and is diametrically opposed to the anti-altruism espoused by the likes of Ayn Rand (the godmother of modern-day neoliberal capitalism). Rand was no fan of Kant, by the way.

COVID-19 presents a moral challenge for us. Do we go the more well-worn capitalistic utilitarian route, even if many of the older and weaker among us die as a result, or do we act, not so much for our own benefit, but for the universal benefit of the human race writ large?

I said before that this disease is going to test us and test our systems, especially those that are built around that Mill utilitarian argument…

I guess it really comes down to whether or not there’s some benefit to being compassionate that outweighs the benefit of being comfortable, materially speaking…

What do you think?

I’m pretty sure that viruses aren’t conscious, but this little bugger sure as hell seems to know exactly what it’s doing…

to US.

Image Credit: Siouxsie Wiles and Toby Morris / CC BY-SA

COVID-19: Are We Really All In This Together?

by Leave a Comment

COVID-19: Are We Really All In This Together?

If you’ve ever perused much of what is posted in this blog you’ve read about impact mindfulness. That’s a concept that I coined some years ago. It has three foundational pillars or principles…

  1. Impact Over (self) Interest
  2. The Big US (or we’re all in this together)
  3. Removing Impact Blinders

I’m hearing the phrase “we’re all in this [mess?] together” a lot these days in the midst of this COVID-19 epidemic…

But are we…really?

And why did it take a worldwide pandemic for us to figure that one out?

Here’s a blurb from a post I wrote long ago about the concept of the Big US…

I’ve repeatedly posted about impact mindfulness using a “we’re all in this boat together” metaphor. I still like the metaphor, but recently a more relevant one dawned upon me. One that involves a sinking ship…enter the Titanic…

In my metaphor, the ship represents the Planet, the crew and passengers, well, People, of course, and the ocean upon which they are afloat, the Universe.

Yea you got it, People – Planet – Universe, or to the handful that pay any attention to this blog, aka, my three dots…

Now isn’t it true that the silly things that divide us, like nationality, economic status, religion, looks, talent, fame, fortune, etc., tend to matter much less, or evaporate altogether, in distressful situations? When the proverbial shit hits the fan, all that stuff seems to decrease in importance, doesn’t it? The thing that unites us, our instinct for survival, tends to take over.

We’ve sort of arrived at one of those moments in 2020 with COVID-19, haven’t we?…

At the outset of the voyage, the Titanic was a steaming cauldron of division. You had the the wealthiest, then just the wealthy, then the servants of the wealthy, and then the rest who had to huddle down in the lower levels, so as not to be seen nor smelt by those above them.

That is, until the Universe decided to throw a tiny iceberg in their path. Then all of a sudden all that seemingly ordered division turned chaotic. In the flash of a moment what mattered more was survival than societal class difference.

Right now our world is being stressed to the breaking point. And we’re learning that, similar to the situation on the Titanic, there are precious few lifeboats.

What the “Big US” proposes is for us to look past what divides us and embrace what unites us, our humanity…before it’s too late.

Prior to the iceberg incident, the Titanic was an invincible ship, at least in the minds of some. She was unsinkable, remember?

I believe there are a few suffering from that same illusion when it comes to our planetary ship. That the smartest among us have it all under control. But even though the Universe seems willing to allow the illusion of such control for a time, when it is good and ready that “control” can be suddenly revoked…even by a microscopic virus.

We’re actually not in control at all. We can all humble ourselves to that fact, or remain puffed up with division until that small impediment (be it a virus, or a tiny increase in the percentage of carbon in the atmosphere) does us in.

Bottom line, the practice of impact mindfulness requires that we disregard division and focus our impacts for the good of People and Planet in general, that is, the Big US.

It would be refreshing if we could make this shift in mindset, from me to we, before the towers fall, the cities flood, or the world gets sick…

Aside from COVID-19, there seems to be a sickness that has taken hold preventing us from seeing things that way. This most recent disaster could be a wake-up call. We’re being called to act for the greater good like never before…

Are we up for the challenge?

When I see people hoarding hand-gel and toilet paper, well, it does make me wonder.

Impact mindfulness has always been about this higher calling. To make living for something greater than oneself a point of mindfulness. Something we just do, habitually.

Bob Dylan wrote that “the answer, my friend, is blowing in the wind.” Yea it is, in tiny droplets of spit that stay suspended for 30 minutes to a few hours. The answer is that, compared to many, we are a soft and vulnerable species. And even more vulnerable the more divided and ruggedly individualistic we pretend to be.

But we are also a resilient and intelligent species. Hopefully those qualities will see us through this one without too much permanent damage…

Hopefully we can learn from our mistakes, especially those of the recent past. The mistake of thinking we can abuse our planet without consequence. The mistake of thinking it OK for mass wealth to be concentrated in so few hands, while so many go without food, or adequate health care. The mistake of not knowing or caring about our neighbors, especially if they are of a different race, religion, or political party.

Yes, COVID-19 might just have a few lessons to teach us before it goes the way of the measles, mumps and smallpox…

If COVID-19 can really motivate us to live by that adage, “we’re all in this together”…

Well, it might’ve just done us the biggest favor imaginable.

The Hardest Thing About COVID-19: Uncertainty

by 2 Comments

The Hardest Thing About COVID-19

We humans have a love/hate relationship with uncertainty. We like a certain degree of it in our lives. We like to say that “variety is the spice of life.”

But, too much of it can paralyze us with fear…

That seems to be about where we are right now with this pandemic. The hardest thing about COVID-19 is the uncertainty.

Here are a few facts about this disease that might help you face the uncertainty…

An important thing to understand about this highly contagious disease is its basic reproduction number, or R-naught (R0). In epidemiology, the basic reproduction number of an infection can be thought of as the expected number of cases directly generated by one case in a population where all individuals are susceptible to infection. All individuals (at least all of those who haven’t already caught it and recovered) are susceptible to COVID-19. There is no vaccine for COVID-19, nor any human immunity.

Scientists have estimated COVID-19’s R0 as between 1.5 and 3. Compare that to the measles, which has an R0 of 12 – 18. The higher the R0 is, the harder it is to control an outbreak. The goal of all the social distancing, hand-washing and testing being mandated is to bring the R0 down to under 1. Once it’s under 1, the spreading will decrease (the curve will flatten and begin to show a downward trend), hopefully long enough to develop a vaccine and kill the damn thing off once and for all!

The other thing we sort of have a handle on with COVID-19 is its fatality rate. It seems to be around 2%, even though in some places, like Italy, the experience has been almost double that (Italy has a much older general population that the U.S.). Compare that rate to the fatality rate of the common flu (around .1%) or ebola (from 25 to 90%). While it’s much worse than the flu, it’s still not that high. Most who get sick will recover and develop an immunity against it, which will also make the rate of spread go down.

I am no expert, but I’ve certainly been trying to understand all the hoopla concerning this virus. The statistics above give me cause for both concern and hope.

The R0 of this infection is not insurmountable. We can get on top of it, as we have with other infectious viruses with similar R0’s (SARS and MERS come immediately to mind). The question is how fast and how much damage will it do in the meantime. The answer is quite a lot, although judging by the fatality rate for this virus, the vast majority of those who succumb to it will recover. Even so, it’s alarming to think that 2% of the potentially millions infected could die from this, if we don’t get a handle on it quick and reduce that R0.

Even though there’s uncertainty in the health risk posed by COVID-19, that risk doesn’t worry me as much as the risk of the havoc it will wreak on healthy lives, especially economic havoc, while we take drastic and economically paralyzing measures to deal with said health risk.

I sell real estate in Costa Rica…to foreigners, for the most part. Will the real estate market here be affected by this? It already is. When a country completely closes its borders to entry of all foreigners, it tends to greatly decrease my customer base!

So, the short-term negative effect is a certainty. The uncertainty is, how short (or long) will short-term be?

I can, at least, fantasize some silver-linings in this cloud over the longer term. But I don’t know when, if ever, they might actually materialize to my economic benefit.

However, this is not a post about COVID-19’s impact on the real estate market in Costa Rica. It’s being written to help me and you deal with the hardest thing about COVID-19…the uncertainty it has inspired. The stock market has gone down almost 20% due to that uncertainty.

So, how best can we cope with the hardest thing about COVID-19?

Well, being factually informed helps. Turning off the TV helps. Meditation helps. Stepping back and surveying the big picture helps…

And looking at this as a chance to make a positive impact on your species, certainly helps…

One sure way not to do that is to become overwhelmed with worry, either about getting sick, or about how this event might affect your pocket-book. A self-centered retreat, reflected in actions like hoarding toilet paper, will not help you reduce the mental anguish of uncertainty, I don’t believe.

My last post was entitled COVID-19: A Viral Perspective. In that one I discussed how COVID-19 is sharpening our focus concerning the risks posed by things like Globalization, Capitalism Run Amok, the ascent of Fake News, and the presidency of Donald J. Trump…

COVID-19 might be humanity’s chance at getting some things right that have gone awfully wrong in the last few decades. I have written in the past on how I feel that greed is at the root of many of our problems. What I mean by greed is the tendency for humans to prioritize self-interest over selfless impact…

For example, it will be interesting to see how the pharmaceutical industry reacts to this, as the race for a vaccine is well under way. Will they react out of compassion, or greed?

Stay tuned…

You see, as a result of this microscopic parasite we’re all of a sudden being asked to dramatically alter our lifestyle…for the good of others.

And that’s exactly what this blog’s been about for the last, ah, six odd years. In a nutshell, what we’re being collectively faced with is the need for impact mindfulness. We can either embrace it, or go on living a purely self-interested way (hoarding toilet paper) and millions will probably die.

So, it’s pretty much completely up to us, as far as the health impacts go…

Yes, COVID-19 will most likely lighten our wallets, reduce our portfolios, and may even force us to skip a fancy dinner or two…

But that might be a small price to pay for the enlightenment that can potentially come via our adopting impact mindfulness as a habit in our daily lives.

As I also said in my previous post, habits, especially life-style altering ones, are hard to instill. It always helps to have a darn good reason…

Our salvation just might qualify as one…

What do you think?

COVID-19: A Viral Perspective

by 2 Comments

COVID-19: A Viral Perspective

Just in case you haven’t heard, there’s a bug going round…

Oh ok, I guess you have heard…

One thing about this particular virus (at least for me) is that it’s encouraging a viral perspective of our world and place within it…

I’m especially referring to the following 5 areas of focus…

Globalization

Viruses have always been avid world travelers. Even way back in 1918, before the advent of air travel, the Spanish Flu infected 500 million people around the world, or about 27% of the then world population of between 1.8 and 1.9 billion.

But these days, just one of these little bugs can hitch a jet ride from Wuhan (China) to Wilmington (N.C. or Delaware) inside the mucous membrane of an unsuspecting airline passenger and arrive within hours, allowing an infection to jump from continent to continent, riding first class at 500 mph!

We have to face the fact that our interconnectedness, commercially and socially, has put US (the big one, that is) at greater risk, even as it has lifted our quality of life.

For the past several years there’s been a backlash against globalization, primarily in the form of right-wing anti-immigration movements. Does COVID-19 bolster their case?

In a way, I guess, but I don’t believe globalization is going to go the way of the buggy whip anytime soon. Better to learn to live with it, even at some risk to our health, than attempt to fight the inevitable. Hopefully, COVID-19 will teach us a thing or two about how to reduce the risk for the future.

Capitalism

At the same time that right-wingers are decrying globalism, left-wingers are sounding the alarm against “capitalism run amok.”

Speaking of capitalism run amok, I read today that Donald Trump might be trying to buy exclusive rights to a future COVID-19 vaccine from a German firm, so that Americans would have access to it at the exclusion of everyone else.

Do I really need to ask if you can see what might be wrong with that idea?

[Note: The story referred to is not verified. Source was The Guardian. I posted it for illustrative purposes only…for all you out there ready to fake-news-shame me.]

But that’s sort of how capitalism works, right? It looks at life as a zero-sum contest where every transaction has a winner and a loser. And with the brand of capitalism that has come to dominate the world in the last, say, 50 years, there are precious few winners (around 1%) and a whole lot of losers (the rest of us).

A bright side of COVID-19 (if I may be so bold) could be that it will shine a spotlight on the failures of the current out-of-control capitalistic system and the neoliberal world order that has taken hold to foment it.

Scientific and Mathematic Truth

Lately every news item that’s detrimental to a particular political opinion is decried by the opposing side as fake news. Our very president has basically undermined the entire free press in the U.S. (at least any part of it other than Fox News and the few radio and TV talking heads that say nice things about him) as such. This has given rise to a dangerous phenomenon in which Americans can’t even agree on things that should be viewed as universal fact, or truth. Take the settled science of global warming, as a for instance.

And now even the existence of this virus is being labeled by some on the hard-right as a democratic (meaning communist) plot to derail the chances for Donald Trump to be elected to a second term.

Denying the existence of known threats to humanity, for political, religious, or idealogical reasons is, well, downright insanity.

And it is very dangerous to our national collective health.

Donald Trump

Donald Trump has seemed fairly invulnerable, until now. Hillary Clinton couldn’t defeat him (even after pussy-grabber-gate), the Special Counsel couldn’t nail him, and the Senate wouldn’t remove him (even though he was impeached by the House). He is the real and undisputed “teflon Don.” Well, that was until he addressed the nation the other night to outline his attack on this microscopic bug called COVID-19. His attempt to assuage the masses (and the markets) didn’t work. And his mighty “Trump economy” is currently at risk of failing as a direct and immediate result.

There’s not a whole lot Trump can point to proudly, other than the economy. So, if his economy goes down, it’s highly likely that Trump will go with it.

COVID-19 might just end up being what finally brings down the Donald.

Impact Mindfulness

We’re hearing a lot about “social distancing” these days. Basically, that means altering your habits to avoid too much direct human interaction. But old habits are hard to break, unless you have a really compelling reason to break them…

COVID-19 is providing that reason…to save others.

But if you’re not at risk of catching this thing (or, at least, dying from it), why should you limit your daily activities to binge watching Netflix?

Well, you’re being asked to right now. It’s not often that we’re called to so high a duty as to seriously alter our life-styles for the benefit of society as a whole.

That’s a level of altruism that’s probably making Ayn Rand roll around in her grave!

Moreover it’s just not consistent with the self-interested, small-us thinking that usually prevails in our dog-eat-dog, hard-core, capitalist, society.

And that might be the number 1 silver lining in this dark cloud we suddenly find ourselves under. Humans being generally mindful of their impacts on others AND in the U.S. even…who would’ve thunk it?

That might be a reason for us to say…

Hey thanks, COVID-19!

And that’s just a viral perspective of this COVID-19 pandemic…

Be safe out there (and wash your hands!).

Connect with RM

Revolutionary Misfit social media connections...